|
[
Permlink
| « Hide
]
=Neal Applebaum added a comment - 20/Feb/06 08:37 AM
I already reported this as a bug as well, Arne. See linked issue.
I'd tend to agree here although this isn't a problem with bulk change as such, but a general problem with the "Issue Asigned" event. The only time this event is fired, is when you use the "Assign" operation, editing a single issue and changing the assignee will not fire the "Issue Assigned" event but only fire the "Issue Updated" event. As Jeff pointed out in I refer to a configuration in which the workflow leads the user through the process.
All "ordinary" user are instructed to use only the workflow-actions, not the standard actions. Depending on the workflow, a status may have the available actions .. The underlying workflow transitions show different screens, one of the fields is the "assign to" field. It is important to have an "issue assigned" notification, which is different form an "issue updated" notification, as it is <b>only</b> fired if an issue is assigned to a <b>new</b> assignee. From the moment that the assignee gets informed that he has to work on the issue, he can watch the issue and every change whithout the need to be informed immediately after a change. If an assignee is assigned to issues only from time to time, maybe after a period of two weeks, he does not look into JIRA every day. In this case he needs to be notified that he is assigned, but he does not need further notification on every change. In the example (described above), a client needs to be notified that some questions occured regarding his issue. The clients usually do not
Exactly. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||