Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: JRA-5410
Type: Improvement Improvement
Status: Resolved Resolved
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Nick Menere [Atlassian]
Reporter: Jeff Turner [Atlassian]
Votes: 223
Watchers: 106
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
JIRA

Subtaskify issues

Created: 01/Dec/04 04:45 PM   Updated: 27/Nov/07 04:41 PM
Component/s: Sub-tasks
Affects Version/s: 3.0
Fix Version/s: 3.9

Time Tracking:
Original Estimate: Not Specified
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Time Spent - 1 week, 7 hours
Time Spent: 1 week, 7 hours
Time Spent - 1 week, 7 hours

Issue Links:
Blocker
 
Duplicate
 
Reference
 

Participants: Adam Cameron, Adam Downer, Ahmad Masrieh, Amdocs Company, Andreas Deimer, andrey dmitriev, Anton Mazkovoi [Atlassian], Bert Van den Broeck, Bin Yan, Bojan, Brian Fox, Brian Nguyen, Christoph Unger, Daniel black, Daniel Kolath, Dushan Hanuska [Atlassian], Elert von Mueller, Glen Miner, Håvard Bjåstad, Jeff Turner [Atlassian], Kevin Ross, Marco, Mario Lefebvre, Mark Derricutt, Mark Stanton, Martin Blazek, Melissa, Nick Menere [Atlassian], Nikita Ivanov, Olle Friman, pierre-yves voirol, Sulka Haro and William Papworth
Since last comment: 44 weeks, 6 days ago
Resolution Date: 12/Apr/07 08:59 PM
Labels:


 Description  « Hide
It should be possible to convert an issue into a subtask of another issue.

 All   Comments   Work Log   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Sulka Haro added a comment - 08/Dec/04 08:03 AM
Two days after upgrading our Jira to 3.x, I've already gotten requests from our internal users to be able to do this. Please, please include this in a near-future version.


Glen Miner added a comment - 05/May/05 03:54 PM
Having just spent the day manually converting existing features & enhancements into sub-tasks I can say that I really would like this feature.

Olle Friman added a comment - 27/Oct/05 02:07 AM
We really would need the ability to convert issues to subtasks, and we really would like it soon. Is there any plan to when this is going to take place?

Mario Lefebvre added a comment - 27/Oct/05 08:26 AM
And that would be a great alternative to the CVS import that does not support subtask import.
And it could be easier to implements?

Thank you guys!


Nick Menere [Atlassian] added a comment - 27/Oct/05 09:47 PM
Hi,
Glad to let you guys know that this has been scheduled for 3.5.

Cheers,
Nick


Ahmad Masrieh added a comment - 16/Nov/05 06:31 AM - edited
Please review this post

and consider this issue as a part of a greater whole.

Ahmad


Daniel black added a comment - 22/Nov/05 05:56 PM
Is it me or does the above linknot work?

Nick Menere [Atlassian] added a comment - 22/Nov/05 06:14 PM
Try this link.

Cheers,
Nick


Anton Mazkovoi [Atlassian] added a comment - 20/Dec/05 01:20 AM
We are hoping to make a 'small' 3.5 release early January which will not contain this feature. The feature will be implemented as part of JIRA 3.6.

pierre-yves voirol added a comment - 10/Jan/06 02:05 AM
Great news !

I think that JRA-5617 ( change a subtask to be a "normal task" ) should be implemented at the same time. JRA-5617 is the exact opposite of the present task.

Cheers,
Pierre-Yves


Håvard Bjåstad added a comment - 04/Apr/06 02:01 AM
Could someone please explain why this issue keeps getting pushed forward? It seems like an easy change, and one that makes a big difference for anyone doing project management and using Jira. Just look at the number of voters and watchers...

I guess I'd like to know whether it's being pushed because Atlassian disagrees with its users about the importance of the issue, or whether it's because of some technical reason that isn't obvious to us outsiders.


Anton Mazkovoi [Atlassian] added a comment - 05/Apr/06 09:41 PM
Hi Håvard,

> I guess I'd like to know whether it's being pushed because Atlassian disagrees with its
> users about the importance of the issue, or whether it's because of some technical reason that
> isn't obvious to us outsiders.

We do not disagree. Our main problem is the huge number of feature requests that we know are a great improvements and the limited time that we have to implement them

We do realise this would be very useful and hence this feature is scheduled. We had enough features implemented and thought that it would be a great idea to share them with our customers. hence we went with the 3.6 release, rather than let these features sit in our CVS and be unused.

Thanks,
Anton


Bert Van den Broeck added a comment - 18/May/06 03:16 AM
Hello,
I am using the 3.6 version.
However, I do not think this issue is implemented in this version.

Is it still impossible to convert tasks to sub-tasks?

Thanks for an update on this issue?
BerT


Brian Nguyen added a comment - 04/Jun/06 08:56 PM
Hi Bert,

Apologies for the late reply, we have fallen behind somewhat in dealing with feature requests.

Unfortunately, this issue did not make it into the Jira 3.6 release. We will keep you updated on any further developments.

Thanks,
Brian


andrey dmitriev added a comment - 21/Jun/06 11:13 AM
When will it be done..

Andreas Deimer added a comment - 23/Jun/06 02:18 AM
Atlassian Folks,

I think that what Jira needs is some arbitrary method to order issues in a hierarchy. The notion of a sub-task (or sub-issue, that is) is ok with me, but when there is only one additional level of contained element, it might not be enough for complex tasks. (OK, ok, you might limit the number of hierarchy levels by, lets say 10, so we do not get to infinity...) Often, some sub-task of a new feature seems easy at first, but you have to split it into several sub-sub-tasks as you realize its complexity. There, you might see, we are also getting into a sort of requirements management, if it is for new features or bugs or any other type of issue.

I would expect something that lets me define some issue as sub-issue of another one. Also, a sub-issue shall be hooked under some other issue or sub-issue, if it needs to be, or unhooked if it becomes a stand-alone issue.

The ability to only subtaskify an issue (JRA-5410) (or reverse it: JRA-5617) is, in my opinion, a crude workaround for the real thing, where you want to be able to manage your work.

Anyway, I think that enough people have voted in support of these, they are on the top of the voting list.

Please consider it, quickly!

Thanks,
Andreas


Elert von Mueller added a comment - 28/Aug/06 09:31 AM
This would be really great to have. Especially if supported via Jelly Script.

Adam Cameron added a comment - 13/Sep/06 06:44 AM
I concur with what Andreas says. My brain works hierarchically, it seems, so I see everything in a tree structure. Projects, issues, components, user/group structures, comments even!... I think of all these things as hierarchical in nature.

Jeff Turner [Atlassian] added a comment - 03/Oct/06 09:27 PM
Sorry everyone, this won't make it for 3.7. We've spent more 3.7 time than expected overhauling low-level things like searching, so JIRA scales under load, doesn't leak memory or cause database locks.

Håvard Bjåstad added a comment - 27/Nov/06 04:28 AM
I have no problems understanding that sometimes new functionality must be postponed in favor of memory leaks, database locks, etc. However, this issue was registered 2 years ago There have been a bunch of releases, and judging by number of votes and/or watchers, there's no doubt this is an important feature. Can you please prioritize it into whatever is the next release?

Adam Downer added a comment - 27/Nov/06 04:56 AM
I'm pratically chewing my arm off waiting for this feature. We use jira to manage our software developement projects and grouping issues under a single heading is something we need (and like) to do quite often. So muggins here has to sit down, create new subtasks, link the old high level task and then closed the old task. Very boring, time consuming work I'm sure you agree. So for this feature to be pushed back again has me on the brink of tears. Please do your very best to get this into the next release of the software or I may suffer some kind of mental breakdown if this doesn't stop soon, I have even asked santa for this godlen version of Jira!!! On the other hand if it does make it in to the next release, I'll be flying over to give you all a great big hug! (although I'm not sure this is a very motivational thing to say)

Marco added a comment - 06/Dec/06 05:55 AM
Need this badly. It's hard to organize all the work correctly the first time. Why must it be hard to fix it afterwards?

Daniel Kolath added a comment - 26/Jan/07 01:59 PM
I recently switched companies where I was previously using Jira and now am using a collection of various tools to manage developemnt. This would be a major selling point in getting us to adopt this tool.

Nikita Ivanov added a comment - 03/Feb/07 08:47 PM
This is seriously missing... it's just odd that such an obvious feature (task->sub-task, sub-task->task, changing parents, etc.) would be omitted.

Andreas Deimer added a comment - 05/Feb/07 03:59 AM
Agreed

Bin Yan added a comment - 05/Feb/07 04:18 AM
Out of curiosity, but what's the magic # of votes for this issue before atlassian actually implements what so many have been asking for? This issue was created in 2004 and here we are in 2007 and it's not going away, mainly because we really frackin do want the functionality. So how about we get thrown a frickin bone and next release actually includes this obviously needed and requested improvement.

William Papworth added a comment - 21/Feb/07 01:20 AM
Any chance of this happening?

Dushan Hanuska [Atlassian] added a comment - 22/Feb/07 09:58 PM
Yes, we had a spike of implementing the conversions Issue <-> Sub-task and it will be implemented in the future. However, no date for implementation of this feature is set yet.

Cheers,
Dushan


Christoph Unger added a comment - 07/Mar/07 01:17 AM
We are still having the same requirement for moving issues to subissues and vice versa. So please, implement this feature.

Dushan Hanuska [Atlassian] added a comment - 07/Mar/07 07:37 PM
As I said before, this feature will definitely be implemented in one of the future versions. We currently have regular release cycles of JIRA and we plan and release features as they fit into each release. Therefore I do not want to promise you which version this feature will be implemented in, but it is certainly on our roadmap.

Cheers,
Dushan


Mark Stanton added a comment - 02/Apr/07 07:26 PM

Change by Nick Menere [02/Apr/07 07:23 PM]
Fix Version/s 3.9 [ 12743 ]

Yay! Thanks Atlassian.


Amdocs Company added a comment - 04/Apr/07 08:53 AM
Based upon the previous release dates, pushing it to 3.9 will mean GA in approx a year ... ?!?