History | Log In     View a printable version of the current page.  
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: JRA-2047
Type: New Feature New Feature
Status: Resolved Resolved
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: Martin Smyth
Votes: 6
Watchers: 3
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
JIRA

Hierarachical versioned components, with cross-referencing

Created: 17/Jul/03 06:54 PM   Updated: 15/Jan/08 03:39 AM
Component/s: Project Management
Affects Version/s: 2.4 Enterprise
Fix Version/s: None

Time Tracking:
Not Specified

Environment: Standalone
Issue Links:
Part
 
Reference
 

Participants: Alexey Efimov, Jeff Turner [Atlassian], L. Vermeulen, Martin Smyth and Uwe Goetzke
Since last comment: 17 weeks, 4 days ago
Resolution Date: 21/Jun/04 12:04 AM
Labels:


 Description  « Hide
What is really missing from JIRA from our point of view is to be able to create component hierarchies within a project and to version components rather than an entire project. In addition, a component in one project should be able to be 're-used' in another by cross-referencing to that components project (the one in which it is really managed and developed). If this were implemented we would also like to be able to indicate version dependencies, and generate compatible version graphs, etc.

 All   Comments   Work Log   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Martin Smyth - 17/Jul/03 06:56 PM
Thinking longer term. It would be nice to be able to move a component from one project to another - as often happens when refactoring.

Alexey Efimov - 10/Sep/03 09:54 AM
This is realy needed feature!
See also
http://jira.atlassian.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=JRA-2314

Uwe Goetzke - 25/Mar/04 03:32 AM
We have 15 master components and 170 subcomponents. In teh moment we prepend the subcomponent with the master component, but this is ugly

For example:

environment_JRun (Lead: Frank xyz) (Delete | Edit)
environment_Resin (Lead: Jens xyz) (Delete | Edit)
environment_configuration (Lead: Jens xyz) (Delete | Edit)
environment_customizing (Lead: Jens xyz) (Delete | Edit)
environment_help (Lead: Anita xyz) (Delete | Edit)
environment_licences (Lead: Alexander xyz) (Delete | Edit)
environment_setup (Lead: Jens xyz) (Delete | Edit)
environment_translations (Lead: Peter xyz) (Delete | Edit)
environment_unix (Lead: Frank xyz) (Delete | Edit)
environment_websphere (Lead: Frank xyz) (Delete | Edit)

so issues would be assigned only to subcomponents but you get a hierachical view for browsing.


Jeff Turner [Atlassian] - 21/Jun/04 12:04 AM
Breaking this up into multiple parts, so each can be tracked/voted for independently..

Martin Smyth - 14/Sep/04 08:22 AM
Does splitting an issue into multiple issues and then resolving it before any, let alone all, of the component issues have been resolved make sense? Has the sub-projects feature made it on to any roadmap yet?

Jeff Turner [Atlassian] - 15/Sep/04 08:09 PM
Martin,

> Does splitting an issue into multiple issues and then resolving it before any, let alone all, of the component issues have been resolved make sense?

When an issue can be broken down into independent issues, we prefer to do so (and mark the parent as closed), as the parts can then be debated and voted for separately.

> Has the sub-projects feature made it on to any roadmap yet?

Not for 3.0, although it will be up again for debate in 3.1.


L. Vermeulen - 15/Jan/08 03:39 AM
This issue is closed because it is duplicate, but he answer at the question is interresting. > Has the sub-projects feature made it on to any roadmap yet? Not for 3.0, although it will be up again for debate in 3.1.
We now at 3.12 and 4 is comming, is this feature still (allready 3 years) in debate!!!