|
|
|
[
Permlink
| « Hide
]
Neal Applebaum - 29/Nov/06 05:10 PM
if they fix JRA-8874 you could remove the Assignee field from the Assign To screen (which for most people would be kind of counter-intuitive, but for you might help).
Teri,
This is available in 3.7. Cheers, Unless I am mistaken, when you disable the operation via the Admin section, two things happen:
--the Assign issue link goes away (as you described) We have the same problem Teri described. People can assign tickets to other people without going thru workflow thereby putting tickets in an inconsistent state. If we can remove the Assign issue link only, then all assignments are then made via a screen which is displayed via a workflow action. The next question is "isn't it still possible for a ticket to get into an inconsistent state when the assignment takes place in a screen?" I'm not sure...we never got that far to test the theory. What I planned was to have the screen that Edit used to not have the Assigned To field. Now, all assignments happen via workflow transtions and associated screens. This then leaves the only gap in the system to be the case where one purposely chooses a workflow transition and assigns it to the wrong person. If we can limit the persons that can be chosen per workflow transition, then that gap is closed, but I could never get this far due to the original problem described above. It says that this issue is incorporated by JRA-8874. But I don't really see a relation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||