[#CONF-6379] Search for Japanese strings should not include partial matches

Confluence

Search for Japanese strings should not include partial matches

Created: 18/Jun/06 06:04 AM Updated: 22/Aug/07 05:43 AM

Component/s:

Internationalisation

Affects Version/s:

2.2.1

Fix Version/s:

2.2.5

Time Tracking:

Not Specified

File Attachments:

None

Image Attachments:

1. screenshot.jpeg
(214 kB)

Environment:

All

Issue Links:

Part

This issue incorporates:

CONF-6383 Allow language packs to choose default indexing language

~~CONF-6382~~ Make more indexing language options available in General Configuration

~~CONF-9258~~ Incorrect search results for single and double-byte Japanese strings

Participants:	Charles Miller [old account, do not assign issues], Dave Loeng [Atlassian] and Neeraj Jhanji
Since last comment:	3 years, 1 week, 6 days ago
Resolution Date:	22/Jun/06 01:52 AM
Labels:

Description

« Hide

When you search for a Japanese string (say 2 kanji characters), the search results should not include hits where only one of the characters is matched. The 2 characters is a unique string (a word) and only full matches to this string should be included in the search results. Please see attached screenshot.

All

Comments

Work Log

Change History

Sort Order:

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Charles Miller [old account, do not assign issues] added a comment - 18/Jun/06 08:42 PM

Neeraj,

I've linked this issue to the two things that need to be fixed in order to resolve it. We'll be right on it.

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Neeraj Jhanji added a comment - 20/Jun/06 12:37 AM

I'd just like to add that if we fix this issue, Sony Computer Entertainment will buy the license for the JP version of Confluence.

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Dave Loeng [Atlassian] added a comment - 22/Jun/06 01:52 AM

Neeraj,

We've added the CJK indexing language to 2.2.5 (you'll be able to select this from the General Configuration page). However, we'd like to point out that your screenshot actually shows a correct search - the result you circled is not a partial match (its a full match on the title of that page - please check again). Although we do admit that there seems to be minor bug with the code for highlighting matching terms in the body of the matching documents.

Cheers,
Dave