|
[
Permlink
| « Hide
]
Geoffrey Corb added a comment - 28/Jul/06 09:00 PM
Yes. In fact, better yet, keep the global group concept but allow an optional attribute of a group to specify a space to which it is related. This is a step towards a much sought after enhancement (from JHU's perspective) to Confluence for "user partitioning" or, better yet, distributed/delegated user management. I'd like to see some user management delegated to the space admin-level rather than the global admin level.
This really should be fixed – allowing users to take security-related actions without letting them understand the scope of the effects is a Bad Thing.
I agree this is a real gap. Having a mechanism by which I grant privileges to see stuff without being able to verify who has access is an awkward thing.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||